Collective Nouns Sv Agreement
I know I shouldn`t disturb, but it drives me crazy to hear collective names associated with plural verbs. When I read Wikipedia, I see where “Led Zeppelin was an English rock band… That sounds fake. The fact that the group was British should not dictate that English rules should apply. I would never say, “Coca-Cola is working on a new formula.” Coca-Cola is a collective noun, so we must use a singular verb, as in “Coca-Cola IS is working on a new formula.” With respect to the second sentence, our article 8 of the convention of reference and verb says: “The pronouns of everyone, of everyone, of anyone, of someone, of someone and of someone are singular and require singular verbs.” The grammatically correct phrase could be: “If all passengers please, stand,” or the heavy “If everyone would take their place, please.” If the two sentences do not follow the same pattern and have the same elements; and they should therefore carry the same subject/verb agreement. In the case of a group of doctors is to travel…. in the previous rules, you mentioned that a collective noun followed by a pluralistic object of preposition agrees to a plural in different cases…. ZB “India has a team of players who are engaged” here we use `are`. Similarly, the group is a collective nomun, followed by doctors. Shouldn`t it be “a group of doctors traveling in Haiti?” As we mention in Rule 9 of the subject verb agreement, a collective noun such as the company may, depending on the author`s intention, adopt a singular or pluralistic verb.
Since the author has chosen to clarify companies as “those who” it seems that your friend prefers a plural interpretation. The sentence could be recast to avoid the question of the noun-verbal collective agreement: could you help me with these words? Can the word “collection” (as a collective noun) be followed by the plural as “family was /family”? A collective noun is a unique noun, always. So if it is the object of a verb, this verb is conjugated in its singular forms. That is why an army is always Daesh, a parliament always Daesh, a couple always Daesh. The appropriate themes and verbs seem simple. But confusion can arise when collective nouns are used as subjects. Some collective nouns may accept either a singular or a plural verb, depending on their use in the sentence. Collective nouns can be difficult because it is up to the sentencer to determine whether the name acts as an entity or whether the sentence indicates greater individuality. In your first example, “India has a team of players who are engaged”, the team of players who act with individuality within the unit. In your sentence “A group of doctors goes to Haiti “, the word group is a collective nobiss that acts as a unit. Therefore, it is treated as a singular noun and uses the singular verb is. A collective bite is a nostun made up of more than one person, an animal, a place, an idea or a thing.
The family, for example, is a collective effort. It represents a unit or a group, but it consists of more than one person. We agree; the verb should be “is.” We have not noticed that the English plural is used in an increasing number of instances for all collective names. AP Stylebook`s rules for collective nouns are: Note that in our rule 6 of “subject and verb contract,” “Generally use a plural verb with two or more subjects if they are adorned and connected.” There are exceptions to this rule when subjects or names form in the sentence a unity or unity, a collective idea or a unity of the idea.